A layman's journey from religion to reason

Re: The Strong Antitheist
Submitted by Bruce (not verified) on Mon, 2008-07-14 03:09.

I beleive it shouldn't technically have to be called anything cause its just basic logic. If you think without being hindered by religious notions, this "God" really is a terrible terrible being and should be promptly shot if he/she/it did exist. Obviously you can't shoot an imaginary being and most of this word is religious, so we do have to have a name. hmmm...id say a militant antitheist would be someone who would want to do something about the problem and a strong antitheist is just what you described.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
seven + = fifteen
Solve this math question and enter the solution with digits. E.g. for "two plus four = ?" enter "6".

Syndicate

Syndicate content

Learn

cover of The Selfish Gene: 30th Anniversary Edition--with a new Introduction by the Author
The Selfish Gene: 30th Anniversary Edition--with a new Introduction by the Author

Recent comments

Come OUT and play!

image

Godspeak

The doctrine of the material efficacy of prayer reduces the Creator to a cosmic bellhop of a not very bright or reliable kind.

— Herbert J. Muller, educator, historian, and author (1905-1980)

Silly Cartoon

Pac Zach Man

Recent updates