Reply to comment


Back in the day, I held a certain pride that the JW bible was indeed a more accurate, back-to-the-original translation than the well-known translations of other sects. I read quotes from "scholars" who praised the JWs' New World Translation as being the most true to the original texts.

Of course, who was providing me these claims and quotes? The JWs. Where was my BS detector, which should have been demanding unbiased verification of those claims? It was in indefinite sleep mode, having been trained by religion to lie down and hibernate.

Re the 72 virgins: I don't know any more about the teaching than that number 72. Maybe there's a wink-nudge implication that in heaven the gals act far differently from the chaste ladies back home in Saudi Arabia or wherever? Hubba hubba.

Reply

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

Spread the Gospel

Share/Save

Spake the people

  • Thanks for the tip. I've nixed some false quotations in the past, and am happy to remove any...

  • Ben Franklin never said that...another of the many fake quotes circulating on the internet....

  • Thank you for the comments. Yes, the passivity and respect you mention are part of the special...

  • Indeed. It cracks me up when an Abrahamic fundamentalist calls atheists amoral, nihilistic, and...

  • This Christians' rhetorical questions translate into those lame accusations we hear from...