I tend to disregard the cultish dangers you mention that involve peer pressure (including disfellowship, preaching to family, etc), but I really shouldn't. While those "congregational" aspects never had a firm grip on me, they are very powerful forces to some current or past members, and can really mess people up psychologically and emotionally.
The blood transfusion ban is, of course, the most outright dangerous bit of JW dogma. It's also one that really makes no sense Biblically. There's absolutely no reason to read "blood transfusion" into what can easily be seen as a clear proscription against eating blood - especially when so many other areas of scripture are interpreted far more creatively! Adding to the absurdity is refusing a life-saving procedure, in the name of the sanctity of blood as a symbol of life.
Can't the Watchtower poobahs receive a "revelation" notifying them that it's now OK to take transfusions? (And that same "revelation" could conveniently add a few more decades to Armageddon's arrival date as well. That train just is not pulling into the tracks, is it.)
Reply
Get updates
Render unto Caesar
Godspeak
My practise as a scientist is atheistic. That is to say, when I set up an experiment I assume that no god, angel, or devil is going to interfere with its course; and this assumption has been justified by such success as I have achieved in my professional career. I should therefore be intellectually dishonest if I were not also atheistic in the affairs of the world. And I should be a coward if I did not state my theoretical views in public.
I hear you, I hear you. Amen, spread the word!
I tend to disregard the cultish dangers you mention that involve peer pressure (including disfellowship, preaching to family, etc), but I really shouldn't. While those "congregational" aspects never had a firm grip on me, they are very powerful forces to some current or past members, and can really mess people up psychologically and emotionally.
The blood transfusion ban is, of course, the most outright dangerous bit of JW dogma. It's also one that really makes no sense Biblically. There's absolutely no reason to read "blood transfusion" into what can easily be seen as a clear proscription against eating blood - especially when so many other areas of scripture are interpreted far more creatively! Adding to the absurdity is refusing a life-saving procedure, in the name of the sanctity of blood as a symbol of life.
Can't the Watchtower poobahs receive a "revelation" notifying them that it's now OK to take transfusions? (And that same "revelation" could conveniently add a few more decades to Armageddon's arrival date as well. That train just is not pulling into the tracks, is it.)