You are hereRecycling an excellent anti-atheist argument / Reply to comment

Reply to comment


I don't have one specific debate in mind, but here's how it seems some debates – whether on the Internets or just by the water cooler – actually do run. See if you don't agree:

Rationalist: What's the evidence for this God of yours?

Creationist: Evidence is not the criteria for everything. Some things are beyond what you call "evidence". There are other ways in which we know God. (Carry on about faith / revelation / "personal relationship" / etc.)

R: But that rationale just as easily supports belief in Leprechauns as it does belief in God.

C: No, belief in God is entirely more reasonable. There's evidence for the existence of God.

R: Evidence? But you just said...

C: So, why do you hate Christmas music and stained glass?

... and on it goes. (A fictional debate, but a very real depiction of what I call the "cricket on a hotplate" method of irrationalist debate: keep hopping from one position to another as soon as things get hot.)

Reply

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

Spread the Gospel

Share/Save

Spake the people