You are hereloon

loon


The Vatican's Express Exorcist

1003church_695324a.jpg

Exorcism?

Here in the second decade of the 21st century, you might think that the only exorcism still to be found in the Church involves casting altar boys out of their robes. But while that may the mainstream of Catholic practices, good old-fashioned hellspawn expulsion remains on the Vatican's menu of imaginary services.

A lot of folks lately have been talking up the story of "Father" Gabriele Amorth, cross-slinging demon-buster of the Holy See, who claims a Vatican-roaming Satan himself is behind Church improprieties ("the Devil made them diddle", I guess). Reading words about – and by – the 85-year-old priest is a trip into utter lunacy, of course, but I gotta say it's awfully entertaining wackiness. Here are some things I've learned about the Church and the exorcist biz in particular: Readeth thou more

God-addled politicos keep speaking in (idiot) tongues

An addition to yesterday's Texan Democrats (a little) less religious than Republicans: Let's take things up from one state to the national level. In Republicans v secular America, Dan Kennedy of Guardian News and Media reports on the latest machinations by a party salivating over the prospect of religion-based control over the US populace. Yes, that's all nothing you don't already know, but it's a jolting drink of gasoline to see so many voices of inanity gathered into one article:

  • Tim Pawlenty: "God is in charge ... In the Declaration of Independence it says we are endowed by our creator with certain unalienable rights. It doesn't say we're endowed by Washington, DC, or endowed by the bureaucrats or endowed by state government. It's by our creator that we are given these rights."
  • Mitt Romney: Deflects suspicion toward his wacky Mormon sect by embracing "any person who has knelt in prayer to the Almighty" – but apparently, only such believers.
  • Sarah Palin: Prays to invisible spirits for oil pipelines. (I presume the difficult words were written on her palm.)
  • Mike Huckabee: "I hope we answer the alarm clock and take this nation back for Christ."

But wait! There's more! Virginia State Delegate and Republican Bob Marshall just added, in a rant against Planned Parenthood:

"The number of children who are born subsequent to a first abortion with handicaps has increased dramatically. Why? Because when you abort the first born of any, nature takes its vengeance on the subsequent children. In the Old Testament, the first born of every being, animal and man, was dedicated to the Lord. There's a special punishment Christians would suggest."

That's right: We're one-tenth into the 21st Century, and this guy claims that handicapped children are a punishment from the Old Testament Yahweh.

Fiscal conservatism? Proper role of government? Those and a thousand other matters are reasonable discussions on real-world topics to be had between "the left" and "the right" in the US, with meaningful ideas potentially coming from both sides. But as long as the Republican party is chock full of nuts like the above, who want to move their adherence to an ancient Middle Eastern cult from an appropriately private matter to a public requirement, any American wanting to keep religion and government separate (as the nation's founders clearly intended) needs to support the lesser of the two evils, the Democrats.

Or get to work cleaning house in the Republican party, pronto. Is it so hard to throw out morons who want to base government on supernatural voodoo? 

UPDATE: The same breed of idiots claims that any gathering of atheists is, by definition, a hate group.

"How dare you tell my child that rocks are old!"

Field trip fail

The situation: A school wants to take 6th and 7th graders to a Fossil Discovery Center to attend a Rocks and Mineral Festival.

The problem: Those awful people are going to tell little Johnny – oh heavens! – that rocks are old!

From I bet that kid is popular in class at the Fail Blog: It's a simple field trip permission slip defaced by a barely-literate parent who thinks a Mineral Festival needs to begin and end with Jesus. The scrawl reads:

Note: Just to let you it is not that we don’t believe in things like that, it is just misleading when you talk about it being billions of years old, when we all know that the world is only about 6,000 years old. So why would I pay so that you can misslead my children, your world is just a revolving(?), ours has a start and an end. God created the world. He created animals and man all in the same week. It was also Adam who named all the animals, they will do the essay 'Rock and Minerals' but it might not be 5 pages long, and about billions of years, it will be according to the Bible.

(Hmm, is this from the United States? Hmm, do we even need to ask?)

We can laugh at the idiot parent, but what's being done to the poor kid is just sad.

I predict more predictions!

calendar.png

I was just about to write a lament over the dearth of new predictions – religious, apocalyptic, or otherwise woo-ey – fogging up crystal balls everywhere. In Death of Darwinism: Need new predictions, fast!, I had reviewed some forecasts that had either failed recently or still sat under a ticking clock. The "demise of Darwinist ideology" and similar prognostications – not as concrete as, say, "Rove and Rumsfeld will be caught in a naked love huddle in August", but still solid stuff with measurable expiration dates. 

But where were some crunchy new entrail-readings? Readeth thou more

Adolf Hitler, Creationist

If Adolf Hitler was an atheist, as some argumentative religious loons keep insisting, he was the oddest atheist ever: a member of the Roman Catholic church who wouldn't shut up about his self-proclaimed role in doing God's holy work.

Hitler was a Christian (if one of a particularly warped nature) and a man of faith even beyond the borders of religion. That's so obvious and well-known that you have to wonder why True Believers keep bringing up "Hitler the atheist" when the claim backfires on them every time. Yet what's pointed out far less frequently (although it's not the least surprising) is that Hitler the Christian was also Hitler the flaming Creationist. Readeth thou more

First Lady of Japan eats sun, rode UFO to Venus, knew Tom Cruise in previous life

The Sun-Eater

Nancy Reagan consulted with astrologers? How sublunary. Miyuki Hatoyama, wife of new Japanese premiere Yukio Hatoyama, goes so much further. 

As reported in outlets such as this CNN article, the good Ms Hatoyama relates in her many TV appearances and books that she knows Tom Cruise from a previous life, when he (and presumably she too) was Japanese. While busy chatting about politics and cooking on the talk shows, she still finds time for the occasional astral trip to Venus via "triangular UFO", as well as moments to "take a piece of the Sun and eat it".

So she sounds like a hard customer to please at those state dinners, though with that Venus trip on her resume, she sure beats "I can see Russia from my porch" Sarah Palin in foreign policy experience. (Despite the kinship to Tom Cruise, though, there's been no report that Ms Hatoyama embraces Scientology. Some things are just too weird for her.)

Of Darwinism and death panels

Health Care Reform loonies

Do animals have it easy?

We all know they don't. Wild creatures struggle to find enough food to survive. They're on the run for ther lives 24/7, too; every day an animal keeps out of some other creature's belly is a minor miracle. Don't forget environmental dangers and the never-ending assault by parasites and pathogens. Nature is persistent in trying to kill its children. 

Don't think that plants get off easily! They compete too for space, light, and water. And just when a young shoot thinks things are going well, bam, here comes a hungry deer or a locust swarm. Microbes too: it's the same struggle against starvation, predators, and hazards. 

Living things are born onto a battlefield. Most never make it to the stage of creating the next generation. It's usually the fittest that run the gauntlet that far – if they're lucky. 

This is something we all know. The struggle for survival in the wild is not a "finding of science"; it's universal common knowledge, obvious to everyone with a pair of eyes. Young people and old people know it. Medieval peasants knew it. Bronze Age peoples knew it. Cavemen knew it. It's as mundane an observation as the wetness of water. 

In the 19th century, Charles Darwin pointed our attention to this common knowledge. As a prelude to a groundbreaking notion of how the struggle for survival shapes differences among generations, he reminded us that wild creatures struggle to thrive and breed, and that fitter and well-adapted specimens are more likely to make it. This is what everyone already knows as common sense.

Alas. Certain zealots with religious agendas decided, for reasons only they (possibly) understand, that the notion of change over generations was an affront to their interpretations of select scriptures. Thus began the shriek:

Oh my God! "Survival of the fittest"! Darwinists want the strong to kill the weak! They want eugenics and murder!

"Oh my God", indeed. What level of stupidity – what level of pithed, triple-lobotomized, saliva-dripping idiocy – can hear "As we all see in nature, creatures struggle to survive and breed, with the fittest specimens having the best shot", and claim to understand it as "The strong among us must kill the weak!"? 

Jump ahead 150 years. We know people haven't gotten a lot smarter, as the zealots are still bleating the above in between changings of their drool bibs. But at least people can't have gotten dumber, letting that idiocy leach into additional issues, right?

Alas again. Gaze upon this sad scenario:

Many people face heart-rending decisions on caring for dying, incapacitated loved ones with no hope of independence from life support. They need to undertake difficult discussions with medical and legal professionals on medical prognoses, care options, legal issues, and the patient's own wishes as outlined in a living will. These consultations are vital, but can add to what is already a staggering financial burden for the caretakers.

As the US debates its national health care policies, legislation was proposed to allow existing social medical insurance to cover the expense of such voluntary consultations. Consultations that have always been available, recommended, and undertaken as required. Consultations that help people, and that could finally become affordable for all.

Enter the zealots, this time with political and financial agendas:

Oh my God! "End-of-life consultations"! The government wants to pull the plug on grandma! They want euthanasia and 'death panels' to kill the unwanted!

That is not sarcasm. As of August, 2009, those are literally the shrieks going 'round the nation. Again, what level of insanity – what level of gibbering, voices-in-the-head, pants-wetting lunacy – can hear "Let's extend Medicare reimbursements to cover voluntary counseling on end-of-life issues", and claim to understand it as "Let's set up government death panels to kill unneeded people!"?

This is one of those times when all you can do is slap a big hand to your face and pull it down like a flabbergasted cartoon character. Or maybe bonk yourself on the head with a hammer and watch the little birdies go tweeting around.

Really, at times like this I wish we could go back in time and reboot humanity, somehow starting mankind all over again with a little more reason this time.

Oh my God! "Reboot humanity"! He wants to kill all of us, and...

Oh shut up.

Added notes on "atheists discredited" deadline

Atheists Discredited!

My earlier entry The "atheists discredited" deadline hath come! was picked up by the 800-lb Pharyngula blog on February 17, in the post SOP for prophets. That mention brought a mighty spike of visitors, a nice handful or two of comments, and lots of discussion back on the Pharyngula page.

For whatever reason, though, I was unable to leave a comment myself on that page, despite three attempts. Maybe it was some oddity on my side; on the other hand, that heavily-trafficked site is known to choke on bugs once in a while. In any case, the comments I wanted to leave on that page are as follows: Readeth thou more